<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Approximatrix Forums — Simply Fortran 2.0 is out!]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=227&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2014-06-09T13:38:12Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?id=227</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Simply Fortran 2.0 is out!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1423#p1423" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p><p>Sorry, but I seemed to have overlooked this message until now.&nbsp; There is partial documentation available for WinBGI-Fortran available at:</p><p><a href="http://tx0.org/7so">http://tx0.org/7so</a></p><p>The documentation is not yet complete, but much of the docs related to colors is complete.&nbsp; The code for the Windows BGI wrapper is available at:</p><p><a href="http://winbgim.codecutter.org/V6_0/doc/index.html">http://winbgim.codecutter.org/V6_0/doc/index.html</a></p><p>The original Borland documentation will be essentially useless for what you&#039;re describing because BGI did not support RGB colors.&nbsp; This implementation, however, does support RGB.</p><p>Lastly, the GitHub repository is no longer being updated as the project has moved to <a href="https://bitbucket.org/ArmstrongJ/winbgi-fortran">BitBucket</a> due to some unsavory business practices by GitHub in recent months.&nbsp; &nbsp;I would suggest starting there from now on.</p><p>Let me know if you have more specific questions.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jeff]]></name>
				<uri>http://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-06-09T13:38:12Z</updated>
			<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1423#p1423</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Simply Fortran 2.0 is out!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1415#p1415" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>JEFF...</p><p>This is XBITS. I have now successfully installed FORTRAN and am attempting to cover a lot of ground in learning its capabilities.&nbsp; </p><p>In one of your notes (last Sept. or so), you mentioned that you were going to provide a wrapper for the Borland Graphics code so that Fortran could call it.&nbsp; I went to GITHUB for further info and found the list of functions, subs, etc.&nbsp; At this time I am especially interested in manipulating the rgb colors.&nbsp; For example, I might want to extract all of the reds within a certain range of values (within the 0 thru 256), convert them to black and lay them on a white background for comparison to other things.&nbsp; What I am doing is simply trying to answer the question: Why are they THERE?&nbsp; Why not somewhere else?</p><p>This may sound strange, but I have found very good reason to doubt the truth of some basic physical concepts, and I&#039;m using the observable universe as a laboratory.&nbsp; </p><p>Now, the question is this:&nbsp; Where can I find documentation on Borland&#039;s code?&nbsp; Is it in the modules, or perhaps in a separate publication.&nbsp; I think that company went belly up some time ago, and their pubs may no longer exist.</p><p>I can download the stuff and go over it line by line, but it would take forever, and at age 84, I cant wait that long.</p><p>Any suggestions will be most appreciated.</p><p>Many Thanx</p><p>Bill Eddy<br />bristolmathnut@yahoo.com</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[xbits]]></name>
				<uri>http://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=3515</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-05-29T21:26:34Z</updated>
			<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1415#p1415</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Simply Fortran 2.0 is out!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=907#p907" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>An update is available (Build 1339) that should at the very least fix the following:</p><ul><li><p>Runtime functions will no longer produce a warning</p></li><li><p>Debugging programs always opens an external console to avoid program input conflicts</p></li><li><p>Projects with spaces in their full paths can once again launch properly</p></li><li><p>Simply Fortran should now more reliably kill the debugging process</p></li></ul><p>This update contains only bug fixes.&nbsp; Requested features will be added to version 2.1.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jeff]]></name>
				<uri>http://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-05T13:52:21Z</updated>
			<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=907#p907</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Simply Fortran 2.0 is out!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=884#p884" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone hadn&#039;t seen the new website, Simply Fortran 2.0 is now available.&nbsp; The new version includes the integrated debugger, as hinted at earlier.&nbsp; Users can <a href="http://simplyfortran.com/download/">download</a> and try out the new version alongside your current version 1.x installation without any issues.</p><p>If you&#039;ve registered version 1.x in the past, there will be an upgrade fee to 2.0 that is significantly lower than the full registration fee.&nbsp; Users who have purchase a version 1.x registration in the last 30 days should contact support@approximatrix.com for an additional discount.&nbsp; </p><p>Additionally, if you or anyone you know has tried Simply Fortran in the past, the new version will &quot;reset&quot; the 30-day trial period.&nbsp; If you&#039;ve already tried version 1.x, you can start fresh with version 2.0 without any issues.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jeff]]></name>
				<uri>http://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-08-02T13:42:54Z</updated>
			<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=884#p884</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
