<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Approximatrix Forums — Which version should I use? F90 or F95 or other?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=743&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2020-03-23T12:54:33Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?id=743</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Which version should I use? F90 or F95 or other?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3447#p3447" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Fortran 90 and 95 are two very similar standards.&nbsp; There were some minor additions and deprecations in the 95 standard meant to clean up some &quot;mistakes&quot; in the original 90 standard.&nbsp; They are effectively the same.</p><p>The file extensions, though, are not important.&nbsp; Extensions <em>f90</em>, <em>f95</em>, <em>f03</em>, <em>f08</em>, etc. are all treated the same by the compiler.&nbsp; Basically, using <em>f90</em> as an extensions just means that the Fortran source code is in &quot;free-format&quot; syntax as opposed to files with the <em>f</em> or <em>for</em> extensions, which are in &quot;fixed-format&quot; syntax (the only syntax allowed in the Fortran 77 standard).&nbsp; </p><p>Personally, I just always use the <em>f90</em> extension.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jeff]]></name>
				<uri>http://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-03-23T12:54:33Z</updated>
			<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3447#p3447</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Which version should I use? F90 or F95 or other?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3445#p3445" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>If I have no need to keep compatibility with earlier fortran versions/features/limitations, is there any reason not to use the .f95 extension with my projects? It is a little confusing because I see collegiate .pdf “starter” files titled Fortran 95 but their content keeps referencing Fortran 90.</p><p>My main interest is to analyze text strings for character frequency and least squares fit to the letter frequency of other strings. In addition, I may want to create linked list data structures rather than be limited to the dimensionality of arrays.</p><p>As an aside, is there a site - here or other places - that have packaged public domain software - like code for a binary search, various sort routines, least squares measure between two arrays, etc. I can code all those things - again - but I don’t mind using something already written as long as it’s been tested.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[designer]]></name>
				<uri>http://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=3903</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2020-03-20T18:45:58Z</updated>
			<id>http://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3445#p3445</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
