<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Approximatrix Forums — Development and Release status]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?id=136</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.approximatrix.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=136&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Development and Release status.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Development and Release status]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=475#p475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have increasingly been thinking how useful it would be to have a development and a release option for a project, with different options assignable to each of them and possibly even different source files, yet all part of the same project.</p><p>I realise that this might go against the ethos of the deliberately created simplicity of &#039;Simply Forthran&#039;, but it would be very useful.&nbsp; What is more, it would be a facility which users would not have to&nbsp; make use of if they did not need it or were unaware of it.<br />--- <br />John</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (JohnWasilewski)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=475#p475</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
