<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Approximatrix Forums — CUDA]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.approximatrix.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=181&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2013-04-09T00:36:59Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?id=181</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: CUDA]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=717#p717" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Carlos,</p><p>It should be possible to link to the packages you&#039;ve mentioned, but it would be a bit of a &quot;hack.&quot;&nbsp; I say this because Nvidia does not support the GNU compilers on Windows for compiling CUDA applications.&nbsp; The pre-compiled packages you&#039;ve listed might be usable with MinGW, but it wouldn&#039;t be particularly simple.</p><p>Using OpenCL rather than CUDA might be a more promising possibility.&nbsp; I&#039;ll look into it and post what I find.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jeff]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-09T00:36:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=717#p717</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[CUDA]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=711#p711" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Why not going parallel<br />cuFFT<br />cuBLAS<br />cuSPARSE..?<br />I wonder if its possible via ISO_C_BINDING<br />mechanism.<br />--<br />Carlos</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Carlos Herrera]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=407</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-08T07:41:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=711#p711</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
