<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Approximatrix Forums — CUDA]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?id=181</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.approximatrix.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=181&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in CUDA.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: CUDA]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=717#p717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Carlos,</p><p>It should be possible to link to the packages you&#039;ve mentioned, but it would be a bit of a &quot;hack.&quot;&nbsp; I say this because Nvidia does not support the GNU compilers on Windows for compiling CUDA applications.&nbsp; The pre-compiled packages you&#039;ve listed might be usable with MinGW, but it wouldn&#039;t be particularly simple.</p><p>Using OpenCL rather than CUDA might be a more promising possibility.&nbsp; I&#039;ll look into it and post what I find.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jeff)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=717#p717</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CUDA]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=711#p711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why not going parallel<br />cuFFT<br />cuBLAS<br />cuSPARSE..?<br />I wonder if its possible via ISO_C_BINDING<br />mechanism.<br />--<br />Carlos</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Carlos Herrera)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=711#p711</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
