<![CDATA[Approximatrix Forums — Type component qualifier]]> 2013-04-26T14:28:48Z PunBB https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?id=192 <![CDATA[Re: Type component qualifier]]> Well then I think a full-fledged protest at the next committee meeting is in order.  I can bring a tent and a grill.

Also, that makes me think that IVF implemented it on their own and kept it hush-hush.

]]> https://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=3441 2013-04-26T14:28:48Z https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=755#p755 <![CDATA[Re: Type component qualifier]]> I'm afraid there is no compiler option to switch to using a dot to reference derived type members.  You'll need to complain to the Fortran standards committee about that choice, but I think a large number of developers already have.

]]> https://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=2 2013-04-26T11:34:33Z https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=754#p754 <![CDATA[Type component qualifier]]> I know this seems petty, but is there any way to include an option to use a . instead of a % to reference components?  In my opinion it really makes code more readable.

]]> https://forums.approximatrix.com/profile.php?id=3441 2013-04-26T03:57:39Z https://forums.approximatrix.com/viewtopic.php?pid=753#p753